Posts

› 2008/10/28

via blog.internetnews.com/

We can't make money selling the desktop that's why we focused on a zero licensing cost business model

Mark Shuttleworth puts it spot-on.

› 2008/10/28

via www.connectedmarketing.de/

Der Twitterer mit den Nachrichten aus der Baby-Krabbelgruppe denkt über eine neue Lebensversicherung nach, um die Sie pitchen. Wenn Sie meinen, dass all diese Menschen und all die anderen, die das Web für sich und ihre ganz eigenen Ideen und Projekt entdeckt haben (dazu deren Freunde, Familien, Bekannten), nichts als Loser sind, dann bedeutet das letztlich, dass Sie Ihre Kunden für Loser halten

Die Marketing-Relevanz von Twitter ergibt sich von den Usern als Mediatoren, die die Nachrichten der Nutzer weitertragen.

› 2008/10/28

via www.connectedmarketing.de/

Denn wenn es eine Kompetenz gibt, die man künftig brauchen wird, dann ist das die Kompetenz "Zuhören". Wem? Natürlich – den "Losern". Oder anders gesagt: allen Menschen, die was zum Produkt zu sagen haben. Tausenden von Leuten, deren Meinung mittlerweile einfach mehr zählt als die eine Idee des Werbers. Das hat viel mit Respekt zu tun, mit Interesse, mit Offenheit und Neugier.

› 2008/10/28

Mark Shuttleworth puts it spot-on

› 2008/10/28

via www.connectedmarketing.de/

Das 20. Jahrhundert war in der Werbung das Jahrhundert der Idee. Das 21. Jahrhundert wird das Jahrhundert des Menschen sein.

› 2008/10/26

via www.stefan-niggemeier.de/

Der Blogger und Medienvisionär Jeff Jarvis spricht bei dem, was regionale Zeitungsverlegern im Internet machen bzw. nicht machen, von einem „fast schon kriminellen Mangel an Innovation”.

› 2008/10/26
› 2008/10/25

via www.scripting.com/

When one of the big guys competes with Twitter, they will do everything Twitter does, compatibly, and they will also offer a firehose without restrictions, licenses or approval. Twitter will have to follow suit, but then it will be too late, they will be following in the market they created.

Gefahr für twitter durch big corporations

› 2008/10/25

Of Guns and Spoons

› 2008/10/24

Android App Store, Statistics.

› 2008/10/23

Republicans voting for Obama

› 2008/10/22

via news.slashdot.org/

The economic crisis will ultimately eliminate open source projects and the "Web 2.0 free economy," says Andrew Keen, author of The Cult of the Amateur. Along with the economic downturn and record job loss, he says, we will see the elimination of projects including Wikipedia, CNN's iReport, and much of the blogosphere. Instead of users offering their services "for free," he says, we're about to see a "sharp cultural shift in our attitude toward the economic value of our labor" and a rise of online media businesses that reward their contributors with cash. Companies that will survive, he says, include Hulu, iTunes, and Mahalo. "The hungry and cold unemployed masses aren't going to continue giving away their intellectual labor on the Internet in the speculative hope that they might get some 'back end' revenue," says Keen."

der arme versteht nicht, das manche leute dinge nicht nur des geldes halber machen

› 2008/10/22

The iPhone is no Netbook

› 2008/10/21

via arstechnica.com/

Carr has filed a complaint with the New Brunswick Human Rights Commission over the lack of high-speed broadband available to some rural residents.

Human Rights klage weil kein DSL

› 2008/10/18
› 2008/10/18

via www.theatlantic.com/

A columnist can ignore or duck a subject less noticeably than a blogger committing thoughts to pixels several times a day. A reporter can wait—must wait—until every source has confirmed. A novelist can spend months or years before committing words to the world. For bloggers, the deadline is always now. Blogging is therefore to writing what extreme sports are to athletics: more free-form, more accident-prone, less formal, more alive. It is, in many ways, writing out loud.

super zitat, dass die zeitliche differenz, und damit den wesentlichen unterschied, von journalismus / blogging / (microblogging) verdeutlicht

› 2008/10/18

via www.alleyinsider.com/

Why is Twitter different than the 9,000 other Web 2.0 companies that are intending to figure out a revenue model eventually? Because people are obsessed with it.

› 2008/10/18

via www.theatlantic.com/

the key to understanding a blog is to realize that it’s a broadcast, not a publication. If it stops moving, it dies. If it stops paddling, it sinks.

matt drudge on blogs (via andrew sullivan)

› 2008/10/18

via www.theatlantic.com/

As you read a log, you have the curious sense of moving backward in time as you move forward in pages

andrew sullivan on blogging.

› 2008/10/18

via www.theatlantic.com/

From the first few days of using the form, I was hooked. The simple experience of being able to directly broadcast my own words to readers was an exhilarating literary liberation.

sullivan, erklärt den reiz des einfachen publizierens

› 2008/10/18

via www.theatlantic.com/

It is the spontaneous expression of instant thought—impermanent beyond even the ephemera of daily journalism. It is accountable in immediate and unavoidable ways to readers and other bloggers, and linked via hypertext to continuously multiplying references and sources. Unlike any single piece of print journalism, its borders are extremely porous and its truth inherently transitory.

andrew sullivan on blogging.

› 2008/10/18

via www.theatlantic.com/

We bloggers have scant opportunity to collect our thoughts, to wait until events have settled and a clear pattern emerges. We blog now—as news reaches us, as facts emerge.

temporaler unterschied zwischen blog und print journalismus

› 2008/10/18

via www.theatlantic.com/

But reporters and columnists tended to operate in a relative sanctuary, answerable mainly to their editors, not readers. For a long time, columns were essentially monologues published to applause, muffled murmurs, silence, or a distant heckle. I’d gotten blowback from pieces before—but in an amorphous, time-delayed, distant way. Now the feedback was instant, personal, and brutal.

blogging schafft eine direktere verbindung zwischen writer und publics

› 2008/10/16

via idle.slashdot.org/

According to a study to be published in The Journal of Political Psychology, you can tell someone's political affiliation by looking at the condition of their offices and bedrooms. Conservatives tend to be neat and liberals love a mess. Researchers found that the bedrooms and offices of liberals tend to be colorful and full of books about travel, ethnicity, feminism and music, along with music CDs covering folk, classic and modern rock, as well as art supplies, movie tickets and travel memorabilia. Their conservative contemporaries, on the other hand, tend to surround themselves with calendars, postage stamps, laundry baskets, irons and sewing materials. Their bedrooms and offices are well lit and decorated with sports paraphernalia and flags — especially American ones. Sam Gosling, an associate professor of psychology at the University of Texas at Austin, says these room cues are "behavioral residue." The findings are just the latest in a series of recent attempts to unearth politics in personality, the brain and DNA. I, for one, support a woman's right to clean.

messy = liberal